'});var st_type='wordpress3.5';
Header
image of captcha
submit

1

Missile Defense Blimps: A Terrible Mistake or an Ingenious Solution?

Written by on Tuesday, November 6th, 2012

The navy may be experimenting with high-powered lasers, but right now missiles still reign as one of the most reliable methods of taking down enemy targets. It will be a while before the US military needs to concern itself with laser defense systems, but until then it will have to focus on the troubling question of missile defense. The DoD may have a rather unorthodox option for missile defense: blimps.

 

These gigantic, slow-moving aircraft almost seem like the polar opposite of sleek, high-speed missiles. Raytheon’s Joint Land Attack Cruise Missile Defense Elevated Netted Sensor (what a mouthful), also known as JLENS, was designed to scan the skies for incoming cruise missiles so that supporting vessels could shoot it down.

And here’s the crazy thing: it worked. The military recently performed a test with the JLENS at the White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico. They launched a test missile and – sure enough – the blimp spotted the missile in time for the Navy to shoot it outs of the sky with a Standard Missile-6 interceptor. Raytheon’s program director, Mark Rose, said, “It was a very successful intercept, and I’m pleased to say lots of pieces of the target scattered over the desert.”

 

Those words of praise came from the guy who helped build it, so you might want to take it with a grain of salt. The truth of the matter is that surveillance blimps are struggling. In theory, blimps should be an excellent alternative to drones. They can stay in the sky for months at a time, their sensors have a range of about 350 miles, and they can hit a ceiling of 10,000 feet, which is far above the maximum range of many modern anti-air weapons.

So what’s the problem? Bad luck, basically. It seems that every blimp program gets mired in delays, budget cuts, cost hikes, and complicated political matters. One of the prototypes even went the way of the Hindenburg when a commercial vehicle accidentally crashed into it. The Pentagon slashed the number of blimps they were planning to build from 14 to two in order to save $2 billion in costs.

 

The recent success of the JLENS might turn things around for the deflating blimp program. It works, plain and simple. They wanted the blimp to track incoming missiles, and that’s exactly what it did. Putting all the bad luck aside, the Pentagon has proof that blimps could help protect naval vessels from incoming missiles. Throwing several billion dollars into a blimp program may sound like a lot, but all it needs to do is save one aircraft carrier to pay itself off. Raytheon vice president David Gulla added that blimps are “significantly less expensive to operate than a fixed-wing surveillance aircraft because it takes less than half the manpower to operate and has a negligible maintenance and fuel cost.”

Could the JLENS inspire the USAF to put blimps into the sky? Will these ultra-efficient unmanned aircraft ultimately replace fixed-wing aircraft that cost twice as much to fly? It’s hard to say for sure, but military consulting firms can help the USAF prepare for this new wave of portly aircraft. We’ve got the expertise to keep the blimps aloft and operational, the only problem is getting over the budget hurdles and the streak of bad luck.

If you want advice about the world of military aviation, there’s no better people to turn to than men and women who have sat in the cockpit and flown some of the world’s most advanced aircraft. With over 50 current and ex-warfighters on call, Strike Fighter Consulting Inc. can give you access to up-to-date, first-hand technical and tactical expertise.

One thought on “Missile Defense Blimps: A Terrible Mistake or an Ingenious Solution?

  1. Pingback: 5 Things the Military Teaches Us about Market Research - instant.ly - Market Research and the Armed Forces | Instant.ly

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>